Search for

Get a Free Search Engine for Your Web Site
Note:Records updated once weekly

Thursday, October 25, 2001

Policies drove attacks, U.S. needs to learn
David M. DeBartolo is a columnist for the Harvard Crimson at Harvard University

Over the past weeks, Americans have almost unanimously approved of President George W. Bush’s bombing of Afghanistan. This strong reaction to the terror of Sept. 11 is both natural and justified. But there has been a disturbing tendency in the past several weeks to avoid any discussion of the direction of America’s foreign policy before this generation lost its innocence.

Any attempt to explore the source of anger that drives many in the Arab world to condemn our military action as “terror” is immediately decried as a perverse attempt to justify the acts of those fanatical, suicidal pilots.

Indeed, nothing can justify the wholesale slaughter of thousands of innocent civilians. No one killed in the attack was responsible for whatever these terrorists hated about America, yet they were held accountable — we were all held accountable.

But this tragedy must not prevent us from examining the way America has treated the world, and the way the world sees us, in the post-Cold War era. Terrorists are filled with uncompromising, blind rage, but their hate does not spring groundless from the sand of the desert.

To a lesser degree, many other Arabs share this hate for Americans. It can be seen every time President Bush is burned in effigy, every time thousands of people take to the streets to support Osama bin Laden or to protest the bombing in Afghanistan.

This widespread anger stems from several sources. The sanctions on Iraq since the Gulf War are seen as crimes, causing the deaths of countless Iraqi children, who themselves bore no responsibility for Saddam Hussein’s evil actions or his refusal to trade oil for food.

But whether we like it or not, America’s support of Israel is the overriding factor in the minds of most Arabs.

America, of course, holds a great deal of leverage over Israel, and the planes and helicopters that maintain Israel’s military advantage were made in the USA. Congress gives over $2.8 billion to Israel every year. To young Palestinians growing up in squalid refugee camps, the injustice must seem unbearable.

And of course the argument isn’t one-sided; it never is. Palestinian acts of terror in past years, including the assassination of Israeli politician Rehavam Ze’evi last Tuesday, are reprehensible. Americans now know the fear in which Israelis live on a daily basis.

Israel has not known a single act so terrible as that which occurred Sept. 11, but the constant, omnipresent fear of a lone man in a marketplace killing himself to annihilate anyone nearby may be even more terrifying.

There is a limited amount that the United States can do to help resolve this apparently insoluble problem. But as one of the few countries that does have significant leverage — especially with the Israelis — we have a duty and obligation to try. When the Bush administration declared earlier this year that it would not actively try to bring Israel and the Palestinian Authority to the bargaining table, many Arabs took that as an indication that the United States did not care about the Palestinians’ plight.

Regardless of all that has happened in the past, the Palestinians are now undeniably in a position of weakness. Without American intervention, they cannot hope to win significant concessions from Israel. Though former President Clinton’s efforts to find a compromise narrowly failed, at least he gave it his best shot.

Without studying the background of these issues, we can never hope to understand the feelings of both Israelis and Arabs. And without understanding those emotions, we can never formulate a just policy toward both Israelis and Palestinians.

This all-encompassing hatred of America came from somewhere. Now, more than ever, we must try to understand that anger, even if we strongly disagree with its premises.

After all, a terrorist isn’t born; he’s made.

David M. DeBartolo is a columnist for the Harvard Crimson at Harvard University.
This column was distributed by U-Wire.

   

The TCU Daily Skiff © 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001