|
Thursday,
October 25, 2001
Policies
drove attacks, U.S. needs to learn
David
M. DeBartolo is a columnist for the Harvard Crimson at Harvard
University
Over
the past weeks, Americans have almost unanimously approved
of President George W. Bushs bombing of Afghanistan.
This strong reaction to the terror of Sept. 11 is both natural
and justified. But there has been a disturbing tendency in
the past several weeks to avoid any discussion of the direction
of Americas foreign policy before this generation lost
its innocence.
Any attempt
to explore the source of anger that drives many in the Arab
world to condemn our military action as terror
is immediately decried as a perverse attempt to justify the
acts of those fanatical, suicidal pilots.
Indeed,
nothing can justify the wholesale slaughter of thousands of
innocent civilians. No one killed in the attack was responsible
for whatever these terrorists hated about America, yet they
were held accountable we were all held accountable.
But this
tragedy must not prevent us from examining the way America
has treated the world, and the way the world sees us, in the
post-Cold War era. Terrorists are filled with uncompromising,
blind rage, but their hate does not spring groundless from
the sand of the desert.
To a
lesser degree, many other Arabs share this hate for Americans.
It can be seen every time President Bush is burned in effigy,
every time thousands of people take to the streets to support
Osama bin Laden or to protest the bombing in Afghanistan.
This
widespread anger stems from several sources. The sanctions
on Iraq since the Gulf War are seen as crimes, causing the
deaths of countless Iraqi children, who themselves bore no
responsibility for Saddam Husseins evil actions or his
refusal to trade oil for food.
But whether
we like it or not, Americas support of Israel is the
overriding factor in the minds of most Arabs.
America,
of course, holds a great deal of leverage over Israel, and
the planes and helicopters that maintain Israels military
advantage were made in the USA. Congress gives over $2.8 billion
to Israel every year. To young Palestinians growing up in
squalid refugee camps, the injustice must seem unbearable.
And of
course the argument isnt one-sided; it never is. Palestinian
acts of terror in past years, including the assassination
of Israeli politician Rehavam Zeevi last Tuesday, are
reprehensible. Americans now know the fear in which Israelis
live on a daily basis.
Israel
has not known a single act so terrible as that which occurred
Sept. 11, but the constant, omnipresent fear of a lone man
in a marketplace killing himself to annihilate anyone nearby
may be even more terrifying.
There
is a limited amount that the United States can do to help
resolve this apparently insoluble problem. But as one of the
few countries that does have significant leverage especially
with the Israelis we have a duty and obligation to
try. When the Bush administration declared earlier this year
that it would not actively try to bring Israel and the Palestinian
Authority to the bargaining table, many Arabs took that as
an indication that the United States did not care about the
Palestinians plight.
Regardless
of all that has happened in the past, the Palestinians are
now undeniably in a position of weakness. Without American
intervention, they cannot hope to win significant concessions
from Israel. Though former President Clintons efforts
to find a compromise narrowly failed, at least he gave it
his best shot.
Without
studying the background of these issues, we can never hope
to understand the feelings of both Israelis and Arabs. And
without understanding those emotions, we can never formulate
a just policy toward both Israelis and Palestinians.
This
all-encompassing hatred of America came from somewhere. Now,
more than ever, we must try to understand that anger, even
if we strongly disagree with its premises.
After
all, a terrorist isnt born; hes made.
David M. DeBartolo is a columnist for the Harvard Crimson
at Harvard University.
This column was distributed by U-Wire.
|