Wednesday, January 22, 2003

Money for reality shows could help solve social problems
Commentary
By John-Mark Day

Fox Broadcasting is dropping serious cash on “Joe Millionaire” so we can laugh at women backstabbing each other in the name of “love” and $50 million. CBS is looking for the perfect backwoods family to turn into “The New Beverly Hillbillies” so we can laugh at the hicks with cash. And the WB put seven former semi-celebrities together in a house so we can laugh at those who used to have money living “The Surreal Life."

What can we learn from this new influx of “reality” television shows? The major networks have a whole lot of money to burn, and they’re looking for anyone who will exploit themselves for a buck.

In this cash-starved economy, it’s nice to see that someone has money. And it’s even nicer to see that they’re willing to spend it on such world-important enterprises. Does sarcasm come across in print?

This could be a commentary on the evils of capitalism, where standards and budgets for education are constantly lowered while television programming continues to throw money around. Or it could also be a critique on the evils of exploiting people in the name of ratings. But it’s not.

There is, after all, money out there for people willing to exploit themselves. But the supply of these people who are also young, good-looking and sex-crazed has got to run out sometime soon. So it might be time for the networks to begin looking for other groups to exhibit in the electronic sideshow of television.

Like, for example, “Who Wants to Be a High School Graduate?” Public school students in economically disadvantaged districts compete for prizes including school asbestos removal, student-to-teacher ratios lower than their area code and private school tuition vouchers. Every week, the contestants can vote one student off, who gets a scholarship to a Division-II school.

And especially for the college crowd, there’s “Beer Factor.” Students take tests and perform other daily functions hung over. In the bonus round, contestants attempt to identify who they made out with the previous night while under the influence. Every week, one contestant is voted off and forever labeled as that guy who just couldn’t hold his liquor.

Or maybe “The Homeland Security Act Presents Big Brother.” Eager audiences can tune in to see their friends and neighbors engage in acts of potential sabotage of the U.S. government. Every week, FBI informants vote off a featured contestant, who gets a free trip to beautiful Camp X-ray.

Then there’s “Survivor: Mental Health Ward.” The state’s mentally-ill patients compete for access to a rapidly shrinking list of counselors and programs. The two “tribes” battle against each other and increasing budget cuts. This one even has spin-off potential with “Survivor: Homelessness” as patients are released (“voted off”) without being treated and cut loose when money for medicine runs out.

Maybe, just maybe, it might be time for the American public to start throwing money at something important on a larger scale.

Or maybe, just maybe, it might be time to cast me as the next bachelor.

 

John-Mark Day is a senior religion and news-editorial journalism major from St. Joseph, Mo.
He can be reached at (j.m.day2@tcu.edu).


credits

TCU Daily Skiff © 2003