|
Expos
and Twins still considered for contraction
MLB
considering contraction before 2002 season
By
Ronald Blum
Associated Press
NEW YORK
Baseball management, its plans for contraction all but over, told
the players association that Montreal and Minnesota were the
only teams under consideration for elimination before opening day.
Owners voted
on Nov. 6 to eliminate two teams, but did not identify them. But
contraction has been on hold since Nov. 16, when a Minnesota judge
issued an injunction that forces the Twins to honor their 2002 lease
at the Metrodome.
Management negotiators
Rob Manfred and Paul Beeston told the players association
last week that if owners succeeded in their plan to eliminate teams
for this season, the Twins and Expos were the only candidates, two
people familiar with the talks said Monday on the condition of anonymity.
Commissioner
Bud Selig has refused to rule out folding franchises for the 2002
season and maintains that no teams officially have been picked for
folding.
Manfred and
union head Donald Fehr refused comment. Selig and Beeston did not
return telephone calls seeking comment.
Lawyers for
the Twins and Selig have asked the Minnesota Supreme Court to lift
the injunction, but the high court wont decide until Friday
at the earliest whether to take the case. Even if the Supreme Court
accepts an appeal, its unlikely to issue a decision on the
injunction before Feb. 14, the first day teams can start spring
training workouts.
Selig has maintained
that contraction is theoretically possible any time before the major
league season opener, when Cleveland plays at Anaheim on March 31.
If contraction doesnt take place this winter, owners may pick
other teams to eliminate for 2003.
The union has
filed a grievance, arguing the decision to eliminate teams violated
the labor contract that expired Nov. 7, but remains in force. The
sides met Monday with arbitrator Shyam Das and agreed that the hearing,
which recessed last week, will resume with sessions in New York
on Feb. 5 and 6.
The Expos became
the last team to release their schedule, and said Monday they will
install a new playing surface at Olympic Stadium before the April
2 opener against Florida.
We are
confident that baseball will be back in Montreal in 2002 and I just
want to express my sincere appreciation for our fans patience
and support during what has been a very trying offseason,
Expos executive vice president David Samson said.
Bob DuPuy, baseballs chief legal officer, said the release
of Montreals schedule was of no significance in
the contraction process.
Montreal faces
a staff turnover in the next few weeks. Expos owner Jeffrey Loria
is negotiating a $158 million purchase of the Marlins from John
Henry.
Im
hopeful well have papers to sign within 48 hours, DuPuy
said.
Henry heads
a group that already has been given approval to buy the Boston Red
Sox for $660 million.
Once Loria reaches
an agreement to buy the Marlins, he is expected to sell the Expos
franchise back to the other 29 teams for $120 million.
Loria is expected
to take many top Expos officials with him to Florida, including
Samson, interim general manager Larry Beinfest and manager Jeff
Torborg.
The commissioners
office will then appoint a chief executive officer to run the Expos
this season. Either the commissioners office or the new CEO
will hire a general manager and possibly a manager.
Montreal drew
just 619,451 fans to Olympic Stadium last season, an average of
7,648 per home game, by far the lowest in the major leagues. Florida
was 29th at 1.26 million, an average of 15,765.
The Expos had
operating revenue of $34.2 million, last among the 30 major league
teams. Minnesota was 29th at $56.3 million.
Montreal will
start selling season tickets this week, and individual game tickets
will go on sale March 1.
Also, a state
task force in Minnesota voted 16-1 to recommend that the 2002 Legislature
vote on two new stadiums for baseball and football that would be
built with public help.
The task force
steered clear of recommending a level of public assistance or what
funding options should be considered first. It expects team owners,
private investors and local governments to bear much of the cost.
|