|
MLB
commissioner postpones cuts until 2003
By
Ronald Blum
Associated Press
NEW
YORK Faced with a string of legal losses, baseball commissioner
Bud Selig finally decided Tuesday that the sport wont try
to eliminate teams this year and postponed elimination until 2003.
Baseball
had attempted to fold the Minnesota Twins and Montreal Expos but
was thwarted by the Twins landlord, which obtained an injunction
that forced the team to honor its 2002 lease.
While
the clubs would have preferred to contract for 2002 and begin addressing
the economic issues immediately, Selig said, events
outside of our direct control, including yesterdays court
decision in Minnesota, have required us to move the date of contraction
to 2003.
On
Monday, the Minnesota Supreme Court refused to consider an appeal
of the injunction by the Twins and Selig.
Owners
voted Nov. 6 to eliminate two teams but did not specify which ones.
Their labor negotiators later told the players association
the Twins and Expos were targeted.
Selig,
without specifying teams, vowed to press forward with contraction
for 2003.
Contraction
was an initiative of the 30 clubs and continues to be wholly supported
by that group, he said. The clubs recognize that our
current economic circumstance make contraction absolutely inevitable,
as certain franchises simply cannot compete and cannot generate
enough revenues to survive. Quite a few of our clubs advocate contraction
by as many as four clubs, and our ultimate implementation of contraction
obviously
may well be affected by the economics of the industry in 2002.
The
players association remains an obstacle to eliminating teams
for 2003. The union filed a grievance to block contraction, claiming
the owners vote violated the players labor contract,
which expired Nov. 7 but remains in force.
Arbitrator
Shyam Das was to hear his 12th day of testimony in the case Tuesday.
I, personally, had hoped that the union had an interest in
helping us solve our economic and competitive balance problems,
said Paul Beeston, baseballs chief operating officer. It
is evident now that they have no such interest and that is a great
disappointment to me.
We
had several discussions this spring and summer indicating our consideration
of contraction. The unions vigorous opposition to contraction
was inconsistent with those earlier discussions.
Owners
claim they must bargain with the union only on the effects of contraction,
such as player dispersal, not the decision to eliminate teams.
The
Twins didnt even wait for Seligs announcement, telling
employees after Mondays court ruling that the team would exist
for its 42nd season in the Twin Cities.
Hopefully,
this gives the guys a sense of security to go out and play baseball,
infielder Denny Hocking said.
The
Twins and Expos rank 29th and 30th in revenue last year, and both
have failed to obtain government financing for new ballparks. Twins
owner Carl Pohlad told Selig he was willing to have his franchise
folded.
We've
anticipated for the last month or so that we would be playing,
Twins president Jerry Bell said. We have a good team, we had
a good year last year, and we expect to have a good year this year.
The
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission, which operates the Metrodome,
sued to force the Twins to honor their lease and Hennepin County
District Judge Harry Seymour Crump issued the injunction on Nov.
16.
The
Minnesota Court of Appeals upheld the order Jan. 22, ruling in a
3-0 decision that Crump did not abuse his discretion in issuing
the injunction.
The
battle over the future of the Twins shifts back to the Minnesota
Legislature, which is reviewing proposals for a new stadium that
could ensure the teams long-term survival.
Republican Rep. Harry Mares, a stadium bill sponsor, said the pressure
is on lawmakers.
Either
we act this session or I believe youll still see contraction
next year, he said.
Alabama
businessman Donald Watkins has begun talks to acquire the team from
Carl Pohlad, who bought the franchise in 1984 to keep it from moving.
The
Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on baseballs
antitrust exemption the following day, a spokesman for committee
chairman Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt., said Monday.
|