Bush
pushes for rights of violent crime victims
By SANDRA SOBIERAJ
Associated Press
WASHINGTON
Victims of violent crime, too often an afterthought in the
courts, deserve a constitutional amendment guaranteeing their rights,
President Bush said Tuesday.
The
protection of victims rights is one of those rare instances
when amending the Constitution is the right thing to do, he
said, endorsing a proposal introduced Monday in the Senate by Dianne
Feinstein, D-Calif., and Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.
If
approved by a two-thirds majority of the House and Senate, and then
ratified by at least 38 of the 50 states, the amendment would declare:
The rights of victims of violent crime, being capable of protection
without denying the constitutional rights of those accused of victimizing
them, are hereby established and shall not be denied by any state
or the United States.
It
would require that victims be notified of public court proceedings,
allow victims to testify in sentencing and parole hearings about
their experiences, and require courts to consider claims of restitution
for victims.
In
2000, Americans were victimized in more than 6 million violent crimes.
Behind
each of these numbers is a terrible trauma, a story of suffering
and a story of lost security. Yet the needs of victims are often
an afterthought in our criminal justice system, Bush said
at the Justice Department.
The
proposed amendment would not allow for new criminal trials or specific
claims for damages. And courts would have the ability to restrict
victims rights if they substantially conflicted with public
safety or the administration of justice.
The
Senate Judiciary Committee approved a similar proposal last year
but threats of a filibuster kept the full Senate from voting on
it.
Opponents,
led by Democrat Patrick Leahy, now chairman of the Senate Judiciary
Committee, argued that a federal statute would be the proper place
to address victims rights, not the Constitution.
Kyl
said Tuesday that a constitutional amendment is called for because
state courts governed by state laws, not federal statute
are where most criminal cases are resolved.
|